€490 SEO decision package
SEO consulting for businesses
I find out whether SEO is worth investing in now, which pages block growth and what should happen next. You get a direct analysis from Jon, not an agency production line.
No commitment. Invoice only after the walkthrough, if the output is useful.
- €490 decision package before any ongoing contract
- The analysis is done personally by Jon Dillemuth
- No account manager or production line
- Invoice only after the walkthrough, if the output is useful
- No automatic monthly retainer
Where should your SEO budget go next?
You are not buying a monthly retainer yet. You get a decision basis for what to do, in what order and why.
- 1 Audit
- 2 Prioritise
- 3 Review
Key deliverables
- Technical SEO audit
- Review of 5-10 commercial pages
- GSC visibility analysis
- Top 5 competitor review
Also: Prioritized 90-day roadmap · Satisfaction guarantee: invoice only after a useful walkthrough
A limited first step before a long contract.
If the walkthrough does not produce a useful decision basis, no invoice is sent.
What to do first, what to do later and what to deliberately leave alone.
I take a maximum of 5 ongoing SEO clients at a time so I can actually do the work properly.
Start with a limited step
€490 SEO decision package
€490
The decision package is for a business that wants to understand the commercial potential of SEO before committing to a long contract. I review the site, current visibility, commercial pages, key search themes, competitors and the biggest bottlenecks. The output is a practical action plan you can implement yourself, with your team or with me.
Included in the decision package
- Technical SEO audit: indexing, crawlability, site structure, canonicals, schema and page speed risks
- Review of 5-10 key commercial pages: search intent, message, content and conversion blockers
- GSC visibility analysis: queries, pages, opportunities and noisy signals
- Light keyword research and top 5 competitor review for the most important search themes
- 90-day prioritized roadmap: impact, effort and implementation order
- Decision support: whether to continue yourself, with your team or with me
- Implementation path for technical fixes: what I can do, what a developer needs and what can wait
- 30-minute walkthrough where I tell you directly whether SEO makes sense right now
Ongoing SEO after the decision package
After the decision package you know where the budget should go. The retainer is chosen based on that.
Light support
from €590/mo
For teams that do most of the work themselves but need clear prioritisation and senior sparring.
- Monthly prioritisation
- Follow-up call
- Small optimisations and guidance
- GSC and GA4 observations
A fit only if the decision package shows a clear need for ongoing prioritisation.
Most common next step
Growth package
from €990/mo
For companies that want SEO to become a steady growth channel and already have a clear commercial goal.
- Service page optimisation
- Technical fixes and developer task guidance
- Content plan and internal linking
- Monthly reporting for decision-making
Usually the most sensible next step for small and mid-sized businesses when the decision package finds a commercial opportunity.
Done-with-you SEO
from €1490/mo
For companies that want me to do more of the practical content, site structure and implementation work.
- SEO strategy and implementation by the same person
- New service pages and supporting content
- Technical fix coordination
- Clear reporting on what changed and why
Best when you want more than analysis and the site already has enough foundation for implementation.
Big agency or personal SEO partner?
I am not selling this as the cheapest SEO service. I am selling it as an affordable senior model where the same person thinks, does and reports.
| Comparison | Typical larger agency | Jon's model |
|---|---|---|
| Contact | Meetings with an account manager while the actual specialist may stay in the background. | You speak directly with the person who does the analysis and prioritisation. |
| Prioritisation | Plenty of reporting, but the decision on what to do first can stay vague. | The roadmap shows impact, effort and implementation order. |
| Client load | You are one client in a larger production pipeline. | I take a maximum of 5 ongoing SEO clients at a time so I can actually understand the business. |
| Price | You often also pay for processes, administration and multiple roles. | The budget goes as directly as possible into senior work. |
| Implementation | Strategy, content, technical fixes and reporting may pass through different people. | The same person keeps the full picture together and can also do practical optimisation. |
| Honesty | SEO can be sold even when the timing is not ideal. | I tell you in the first call if SEO is not the smartest channel right now. |
Who this works best for
- A small or mid-sized business with a website and a clear product or service, but not enough organic enquiries.
- A company that wants to understand the real SEO bottleneck before buying a retainer.
- A business that values direct access to the person doing the work instead of buying SEO through a production line.
- A decision-maker who wants to understand what the budget is used for and why.
- A company that can make the most important website changes after the decision package.
What the deliverables include
- Technical audit and the most important fixes
- SEO and conversion review of commercial pages
- GSC visibility analysis of pages, queries and opportunities
- Light keyword research and top 5 competitor review for the main search themes
- 90-day roadmap with impact and effort estimates
- Clear split: what I can do, what a developer should do and what should wait
- Recommendation for the next step: self-service, developer tasks or outsourced SEO work
- 30-minute walkthrough and direct recommendation
How does the project work?
A clear process, so you always know where things stand.
- 1Discovery, 30 min
We review goals, current state and timing. I usually respond within 2 business days after your first message. If SEO is not the smartest channel right now, I say it directly.
- 2Decision package analysis
I review the technical foundation, commercial pages, GSC data, key search themes, top 5 competitors and the biggest growth blockers. You usually need to spend 60-90 minutes on initial context, access and the walkthrough.
- 390-day roadmap
You get a prioritized list of what to do first, what to do later and what not to do yet. Each important task is tied to impact, effort and ownership.
- 4Next-step decision
You can implement the roadmap yourself, with your team or continue with me through light support, a growth package or done-with-you SEO. Nothing starts automatically.
Why I do not start with a monthly retainer
Because it is often a bad way for a small or mid-sized business to buy SEO. SEO can be an excellent growth channel, but only when the website, offer and search demand line up.
If service pages are thin, the technical foundation is broken or the search demand is in the wrong stage, a monthly retainer can start producing reports before it produces decisions. That is why I start with a limited decision package.
What €490 includes and what it does not include
A low-risk first step can sound suspicious if the limits are not clear. That is why the decision package must be possible to buy without worrying that €490 is only a doorway to a larger contract.
| Question | Included in the decision package | Not included in the decision package |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis | Technical SEO, commercial pages, GSC visibility, keywords, competitors and a prioritized 90-day roadmap | A full rewrite of the entire site or broad technical implementation |
| Scope | On small sites, a broad technical review. On larger sites, a crawl, key templates and 5-10 key commercial pages | Manual page-by-page auditing of thousands of URLs for €490 |
| Competitors | Top 5 competitor review for the most important search themes | A full market and backlink study of every competitor |
| Implementation | Clear tasks for you, your developer or future work | An automatic retainer or hidden implementation invoice |
| Decision | Direct recommendation: continue yourself, with your team, with me or do not invest in SEO yet | Sales pressure to continue if SEO is not the smartest channel right now |
| Payment | Invoice only after the 30-minute walkthrough, if the output is useful | Upfront payment before you have seen the quality of the work |
| Guarantee | A clear decision basis or no invoice | A guarantee on rankings, traffic or lead volume in 30 days |
What can actually be done with the tools for €490?
€490 is not enough to manually review every URL, backlink, competitor and piece of content page by page. It is better to say that directly.
It is enough for a good decision if the analysis is scoped correctly: a crawl of the whole site, manual deep-dive into the most important pages, GSC and GA4 data, search result review and the top 5 competitors for the main commercial themes.
| Tool or step | What I check | What it is enough for in the package |
|---|---|---|
| Screaming Frog | Indexing, status codes, canonicals, headings, metadata, internal links, site structure and schema findings | A technical picture of the whole site and critical issue detection. |
| Google Search Console | Pages, queries, CTR, average positions, impressions and growth opportunities | Shows where Google is already testing the site and where better rankings may be within reach. |
| GA4 | Organic conversions, key landing pages and user paths | Helps separate traffic growth from commercially useful growth. |
| DataForSEO and SERP review | Search results, competitor page types, intent and the current top 5 standard | Shows what Google's first page is currently rewarding for the most important queries. |
| Firecrawl and page analysis | Important page content, structural readability, crawlability and AI-search-friendly context | Helps evaluate visibility for search engines and AI-assisted search. |
| Manual senior review | 5-10 key commercial pages, buyer objections, CTA path and content gaps | Turns tool data into a decision about what should happen first. |
On a small site, this may be close to a practical review of the whole site. If a site has 5000 URLs, the crawl covers the whole, but manual review focuses on templates, the most important service or category pages and search themes with commercial meaning.
The exact guarantee
The satisfaction guarantee cannot mean that I promise Google will react within 30 days. That would be the wrong promise.
The guarantee means this: the decision package must give you a decision basis that helps you understand the current SEO situation, the biggest blockers and the sensible order of work.
| You get from the package | Why it is included |
|---|---|
| Prioritized technical findings | So you do not spend time on small issues before the real bottlenecks. |
| Commercial page review | So SEO does not become visibility without a better buyer path. |
| GSC observations | So the decision is based on real search data instead of guesswork. |
| Top 5 competitor review | So you see what current search results require instead of optimizing in a vacuum. |
| 90-day roadmap | So you know what comes first, who owns it and what can wait. |
| Next-step recommendation | So you know whether to continue yourself, with your team, with me or not yet at all. |
If one of these is missing in a way that makes the decision package unclear or useless, you say it in the walkthrough or within 30 days after it. I fix the gap or do not send the invoice.
What do you see before buying longer work?
In SEO, the problem is rarely a lack of information. The problem is too much information and unclear priorities.
In the decision package, you see how I think:
- I look at commercial potential first, not only technical errors
- I separate quick fixes from long-term building work
- I combine GSC data, site structure and buyer questions into one view
- I say directly if organic search is not the best place to spend money yet
What can I honestly show from my own GSC data?
My own site is still young, so I do not use it as proof that SEO has already produced large client results. That would be an exaggeration.
It can still show how I read data and how I find opportunities even when there is not much traffic yet.
| GSC observation | Data 19 Feb-19 May 2026 | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Whole site | 44 clicks, 13,094 impressions, average position 31.7 | The site is indexed, but commercial SEO is still early. |
| SEO service page | 171 impressions, main commercial finding: tekninen seo konsultti, position 11.8 | Google is already testing the page on relevant searches, but the page needs more authority and internal support. |
| SEO guide | 1,120 impressions, hakukoneoptimointi opas position 18.2 | The pillar content has visibility, but it is not enough on its own for commercial growth. |
| Striking distance | 29 queries in positions 5-15 during the last 28 days | There are small opportunities where title work, internal links and content refinement can move faster. |
Why I do this personally
I am not building a large SEO agency because I do not want to spend my time running a production machine. I want to focus on the work where I can be most useful: analyzing the site, prioritizing work, improving commercial pages and helping a company know where SEO budget should go.
That has practical value for the buyer. When the same person studies the data, reads the pages, reviews competitors and walks through the plan, information does not split across roles. In the decision package, you are not buying an account manager’s interpretation of someone else’s analysis. You are getting a direct conversation with the person doing the work.
| What this means | Why it reduces buyer risk |
|---|---|
| Maximum 5 ongoing SEO clients at a time | I do not sell more ongoing work than I can personally handle well. |
| The same person analyses and reports | You do not have to guess who actually understands your site's situation. |
| Communication in the format that works for you | Email, Teams, Slack or phone is fine as long as decisions stay clear. |
| I usually respond within 2 business days | You get a realistic response time instead of an unbelievable 24/7 promise. |
How does the price compare to other SEO services?
There are three common ways SEO work is priced.
The cheapest monthly packages often start around €349-450 per month. They can be useful if the need is light, the site is small and the client can participate actively. A typical ongoing SEO service for a small or mid-sized business often sits around €350-1200 per month. Larger agencies often start closer to €1000 per month or above because the service includes more roles, processes and production capacity.
My model is not trying to be the cheapest. It is trying to be the easiest to buy sensibly.
| Model | What you buy | When it makes sense |
|---|---|---|
| Light SEO package | Regular guidance, small optimisations and often a lot of client-side work | When the budget is small and you have time to participate yourself. |
| €490 SEO decision package | Current state, bottlenecks, potential, competitors and 90-day next steps | When you do not yet know whether ongoing SEO work is worth buying. |
| Ongoing senior support | Prioritisation, implementation, measurement and commercial page development | When the decision package shows a clear commercial SEO opportunity. |
| Large agency | A broader team, more production capacity and often multiple channels | When you need SEO, content, advertising, analytics and large ongoing production at the same time. |
What is left in your hands after the package?
At the end of the decision package, you should not only have a report. You should have a decision.
You get four practical outputs:
- Current state summary: what works, what blocks visibility and what is noise.
- Commercial opportunity map: which services, queries and pages can realistically bring enquiries.
- 90-day task list: what should happen first, who can do it and how large the likely impact is.
- Next-step recommendation: whether you should do the work yourself, give it to a developer, continue with me or leave SEO aside for now.
That is the difference. Many SEO audits show problems. A useful decision package helps you decide what to do with them.
How success is measured
A bad SEO metric is one that looks good in a report but does not help sales. That is why I measure different things at different stages.
| Timeline | Primary metric | Why it is the right metric |
|---|---|---|
| First 30 days | Decision quality: do we know the key pages, queries, blockers, ownership and next 90-day tasks | At this stage, we should not pretend Google has already proven the impact. |
| 1-3 months | Implementation and leading signals: fixed technical blockers, improved pages, impressions, CTR and movement in key rankings | These show whether the work is moving in the right direction before conversion data is large enough. |
| 3-6 months | Organic conversions: leads, sales, enquiries or another agreed goal | Conversions become the most important metric once there is enough data. |
| Ongoing | Business-relevant organic traffic for selected search themes | Traffic is useful only when it comes from searches where a buyer can move toward a decision. |
A large enquiry or sales opportunity usually takes longer than a light conversion, such as a guide download or newsletter signup. That is why I do not promise a specific lead count upfront. I promise to build the measurement so we see whether the right things move: important pages, important queries and conversions from organic traffic.
What the finished roadmap looks like
The output is not just “here are 47 SEO issues”. You get a prioritisation view that shows what affects the business and what the work requires.
| Task | Impact | Effort | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fix the search intent and heading structure of the most important service page | High: the page answers the commercial query better | Medium | Me or the person responsible for content | First 2 weeks |
| Add missing internal links from the SEO pillar to the service page | Medium: helps the important page become easier to find | Small | Me or the site owner | First week |
| Fix canonical or noindex issues that confuse indexing | High if the issue exists | Depends on the platform | Developer or me depending on the CMS | Immediately if critical |
| Write supporting content for a lower-intent query | Long-term | Medium or high | Content producer or me | Only after commercial pages are in order |
This protects the budget. Not everything is worth doing immediately. Some SEO ideas sound good but are not the first place for a small or mid-sized business to spend money.
What a good audit finding looks like
An audit is not convincing if it is only a long table of disconnected notes. A useful finding explains four things: what was found, what it is based on, why it matters commercially and what should happen next.
Below are examples of how I format the most important findings in the decision package.
A commercial page is close to page one, but not strong enough yet
Google Search Console shows that the SEO service page has started appearing for relevant searches. For example, the query “tekninen seo konsultti” had an average position of 11.8 in the 90-day data.
Show technical details
Why this matters: Google already understands the topic, but the page has not yet earned a page-one position. The first job is not mass content production. It is strengthening the existing page.
Recommendation: improve the title, add internal links from the SEO guide and technical SEO articles, expand the page with buyer decision questions and monitor whether CTR, impressions and ranking improve during the next weeks.
Important pages are not always discoverable through internal links
In a public audit example, a Screaming Frog crawl found the main pages, but some important project pages were outside normal HTML linking. A human could browse to them, but the path was not as clear for search engines and AI crawlers.
Show technical details
Why this matters: if important pages are not discoverable as normal links, Google may not weigh them correctly. The same issue can affect service pages, references, category pages or ecommerce product pages.
Recommendation: add regular HTML links to important pages, lift priority pages into the main content and verify with Screaming Frog that the pages are discoverable without JavaScript-based navigation.
The technical foundation can be fine while the page still does not sell
A PageSpeed report or crawl result may look good while the commercial page is still too thin. A common issue is that the page says the service exists but does not answer price, scope, risk, timeline and buyer uncertainty.
Show technical details
Why this matters: SEO does not create value if organic traffic lands on a page that does not help the buyer make a decision. Visibility and conversion need to be reviewed together.
Recommendation: add clear pricing, exact deliverables, risk reduction, comparison against alternatives, FAQ and a call to action that fits the buyer’s stage.
One search theme can split across several URLs
In GSC data, the same search theme may appear across several pages. That is not always a mistake, but it should be checked if no single page becomes the clear primary result.
Show technical details
Why this matters: if Google does not know which page best answers a commercial query, visibility may split across several average results.
Recommendation: choose one main page for the search theme, strengthen it with internal links and make supporting content serve the main page. Merge overlapping content when needed.
How to choose an SEO partner
There is one thing worth listening for on competitor pages: a good SEO service is not only a technical check. It should connect search demand, content, technical foundation, user experience and the business goal.
Ask at least these before buying:
- Who does the analysis and who does the actual work?
- What happens in the first 30 days?
- How do you decide what not to do yet?
- Will I see GSC data, search intent and commercial pages in one view?
- How does the work connect to leads, enquiries or sales conditions, not just traffic?
- What happens if the analysis shows SEO is not the best investment right now?
When should you do the decision package now?
You should not manufacture urgency, but there are situations where waiting costs money. The decision package is especially useful if one of these is true:
- the site has just been redesigned or a redesign is coming
- service pages exist, but they do not bring enquiries
- Search Console shows impressions, but clicks or leads do not follow
- competitors show up in searches where you should be an option
- content is being produced, but nobody knows which topics support sales
- You want to reduce long-term dependence on paid traffic
First 30 days roadmap
Context and access
- Goals and most important services
- GSC and GA4 access or exports
- Current commercial page mapping
Analysis and bottlenecks
- Technical SEO audit
- Search demand and visibility review
- Service page content and conversion review
Roadmap
- Fixes ranked by impact
- 90-day implementation order
- View on what to do yourself and what to outsource
Walkthrough and decision
- 30-minute review
- Recommendation for the next step
- Decision: self-serve, team implementation or ongoing support
Who this is not for
This is not the right solution if you want someone to promise the first position on Google. That promise would be either incompetent or dishonest.
It is also not a fit if your website, offer or sales process is so unfinished that SEO would only be a cosmetic layer. In that case, it is better to build a better service page, clarify the message or fix measurement first.
It is also not the best choice if you want to outsource a large volume of content production immediately from month one. In that case, a larger agency or content team may be better. My value at the start is that you do not pay for production before knowing what should be produced.
The SEO decision package is usually not the first choice if:
- you need leads this week
- you cannot make website changes after the package
- there is no clear demand for the product or service yet
- you cannot provide any data, access or background information
- you only want a monthly report without decisions and implementation
SEO, AEO and GEO in the same practical work
SEO is no longer only about title tags. A company’s content needs to answer traditional search results, question-based search, AI Overviews and AI-assisted research.
In practice, the decision package checks things like:
- service page search intent answers the buyer’s actual questions
- content gives clear definitions, comparisons, prices, limits and next steps
- FAQ sections handle decision-blocking questions, not only generic keywords
- schema, internal linking and site structure help search engines understand the whole
- expertise is shown through concrete work, not only by claiming to be an expert
| Area | What I check | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional SEO | Indexing, search intent, title, internal linking and site structure | Without the foundation, the page cannot compete in commercial searches. |
| AEO | Questions, concise answers, FAQ and a clear decision path | The page can better support question-based search and snippet-style answers. |
| GEO | Entities, sources, expertise, structured content and clear context | AI-assisted search needs understandable wholes, not isolated keywords. |
What I do and what I need from you
SEO often fails because responsibilities stay unclear. I split the work at the start:
| Area | I handle | I need from you |
|---|---|---|
| Data | GSC and GA4 analysis, page-level findings and prioritisation | Access or exports plus information about your most important services. |
| Technical | Issue detection, prioritisation and clear tasks for a developer | Ability to implement critical technical changes on the site. |
| Content | Search intent, structure, service page improvement ideas and implementation when agreed | Expert knowledge about services, customers and common sales objections. |
| Decisions | A direct recommendation on where to focus | A choice on whether implementation happens yourself, with your team or with me. |
You usually need to spend around 60-90 minutes during the whole decision package. I need the initial context, access or exports and the walkthrough. If I know early that missing data would make the package too weak, I say that before we start.
What if technical fixes require a developer?
This is common, and it should not make the decision package useless. Not every SEO issue is something a consultant should or can fix through CMS access.
That is why I divide technical findings into three groups:
| Fix type | What happens |
|---|---|
| I can implement or guide quickly | For example heading structure, internal linking, metadata, content structure or CMS-level changes. |
| Task for a developer | You get a clear explanation of the issue, impact, suggested fix and priority. |
| Not worth doing yet | If the fix requires a lot of work but impact is small, it is moved later or left out. |
The goal is not to collect the longest possible technical issue list. The goal is to know which technical issues actually block growth.
What I do not promise
I do not promise the first position on Google. I do not promise a specific number of leads in 30 days. I do not promise every industry can be won quickly with SEO.
I promise this: I make visible where SEO money should go and where it should not. If I find quick fixes, I put them first. If growth requires long-term content and authority work, I say that before you spend monthly budget on it.
How I handle the lack of long public references
If I had a long list of major SEO cases, I would use it. At this stage, I do not build sales on fake authority.
That is why I offer a limited decision package, show how I analyze data and give risk reduction around the usefulness of the package. It is a more honest way to start than asking for a 12-month contract immediately.
In practice, I build trust like this:
- I show in the discovery call how I assess the site
- I use my own data and public methodology instead of inflated case claims
- I limit the first purchase so it is not expensive
- I make findings visible so you can judge the thinking before a retainer
- I give the decision package a guarantee that applies to what I can actually promise
What happens in the discovery call?
When you contact me, I usually respond within 2 business days. I suggest a time for a 30-minute call and ask for the website URL plus short context about the most important services.
In the call, we review the site’s current state, key services, business goals and why SEO is being considered now.
I do not use the call to pressure you into buying the decision package. The main question is this: is SEO a sensible place to spend money right now?
If the answer is yes, we agree on the start of the decision package. If the answer is no, I tell you what would be a better next step.
If we continue to the package, I ask for the needed access or exports, agree on the timeline and tell you immediately if missing data limits the analysis.
Common questions
Other questions? Get in touch
Why is the SEO decision package only €490?
Because you do not yet have a reason to buy a longer contract. The €490 decision package lowers the starting risk and lets me show how I think before asking for a bigger commitment.
What does the 30-day satisfaction guarantee mean?
It means the decision package must produce technical findings, a commercial page review, GSC observations, competitor review, a prioritized 90-day roadmap and a clear next-step recommendation. I invoice only after the walkthrough. If you do not get a clear decision basis from those, no invoice is sent. The guarantee does not cover rankings, traffic or lead volume.
How is this different from cheap monthly SEO packages?
The cheapest monthly packages can work if you need light guidance and can do a lot yourself. My model starts with a decision package so we first find out what is actually worth doing. The ongoing package is chosen only after that.
Can I implement the roadmap myself?
Yes. One point of the decision package is to make the work clear enough that you can do part yourself, give part to a developer or continue with me only where outside support is actually useful. The package does not create an automatic monthly retainer.
Why choose you instead of a larger agency?
If you need a large team, broad production capacity and multiple channels at once, an agency may be a better fit. If you want direct access to the specialist, a limited starting risk and senior prioritisation without handoffs, my model is often more sensible.
How quickly can SEO produce results?
Technical fixes and improvements to pages that already get impressions can show movement within weeks. Content and authority work usually takes 3-6 months. The first 30 days measure the quality of the decision: do we know what to do, why and in what order?
How much time does this take from me?
Usually 60-90 minutes. I need initial context about your most important services, access to GSC and ideally GA4 or exports, plus the 30-minute walkthrough. I do the actual analysis.
How broad is the €490 decision package?
On a small site, I can review the technical picture broadly. On larger sites, I run a crawl and manually deep-dive into 5-10 key commercial pages, key templates and 3-5 search themes. If a site has thousands of URLs, the audit uses sampling and priority pages, not a manual page-by-page review.
What if technical fixes require a developer?
Then they go into the roadmap as clear tasks: what the issue is, why it affects SEO, how it should be fixed and how important it is. If the fix can be done through the CMS and we agree on implementation work, I can do part of it myself. If a developer is needed, the task is easier to hand over.
What if I do not have Google Search Console or GA4 yet?
A lighter version is still possible, but the analysis will be more limited. I usually recommend setting up measurement first because without data some decisions would rely too much on guesswork. I can set up GSC and GA4 as a small separate task before the SEO analysis.
Is the lack of long public SEO references a problem?
It is a risk, and I do not hide it. I reduce that risk with a limited decision package, my own data, public audit examples, transparent working methods and a guarantee that applies to the usefulness of the package.
Do you do the work yourself or only advise?
Both are possible. Light support focuses on prioritisation and sparring. The growth package and done-with-you SEO include more practical optimisation, site structure and content work.
How do you keep the service personal in practice?
I limit ongoing SEO clients to a maximum of five at a time. I do not want to build a large agency where clients move into a production pipeline. I want to do better analysis, prioritisation and implementation for a smaller group myself.
What do you need to get started?
I need the site URL, information about your most important services, access to Google Search Console and ideally GA4. If access cannot be given immediately, exports are enough to start. I will tell you in the discovery call if missing data would weaken the package too much.
Free audit
Want to look at this together?
Book a free 30-minute call. We'll review the current state and where to focus first. No pressure.